Follow Cssprepforum WhatsApp Channel Follow Now

Rethinking Pakistan's Foreign Policy: Ideology vs. National Interest

Miss Iqra Ali

Miss Iqra Ali, CSS GSA & Pakistan Affairs Coach, empowers aspirants expertly.

View Author

28 July 2025

|

335

Pakistan’s foreign policy has often been driven by ideological commitments and emotional considerations, particularly in relation to India and regional conflicts. The historical context of Pakistan’s creation, alongside its animosity towards India, has led to a foreign policy that sometimes overlooks national interests in favor of emotional and ideological stances. This editorial argues that for Pakistan to prosper, its foreign policy must evolve towards pragmatic decision-making, prioritizing national security, economic growth, and global partnerships. A shift towards a more balanced, interest-driven approach is essential for Pakistan to strengthen its position on the global stage and foster long-term stability.

Rethinking Pakistan's Foreign Policy: Ideology vs. National Interest

Foreign policy requires a delicate balancing act, one that demands strategic thinking, pragmatic decision-making, and a clear understanding of national interests. Pakistan’s foreign policy has historically leaned more toward emotional and ideological motivations rather than pure strategic calculations. While many Western nations pursue policies based on economic goals and geopolitical positioning, Pakistan has often allowed historical grievances and ideological solidarity to guide its choices.

Follow Cssprepforum WhatsApp Channel: Pakistan’s Largest CSS, PMS Prep Community updated

Led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, Cssprepforum helps 70,000+ aspirants monthly with top-tier CSS/PMS content. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for solved past papers, expert articles, and free study resources shared by qualifiers and high scorers.

Follow Channel

The roots of Pakistan’s emotional foreign policy trace back to its founding in 1947. The Two-Nation Theory, rooted in religious and cultural identity, became the ideological basis for foreign relations from the start. This emotional foundation pushed Pakistan to position itself as a defender of Muslim causes globally—sometimes at the expense of pursuing balanced, interest-driven diplomacy.

The animosity with India has been central to this emotional posture. The unresolved Kashmir dispute has served as a perpetual emotional anchor for Pakistan’s regional diplomacy. Decades of hostility, wars, and failed peace efforts have reinforced a reactive and sometimes confrontational policy orientation toward India.

This emotionally guided policy has also strained Pakistan’s broader diplomatic potential. Pakistan’s refusal to recognize Israel and its unwavering support for Palestine, though ideologically consistent, have limited opportunities for strategic partnerships. In a rapidly shifting Middle East, many countries are diversifying their alliances—something Pakistan has hesitated to do due to public sentiment and ideological rigidity.

The cost of such emotional foreign policy decisions has also manifested in economic terms. A significant portion of Pakistan’s national budget has been consistently allocated to defense rather than economic development. Military escalations with India and involvement in regional conflicts have diverted resources from education, health, and infrastructure.

These ideological leanings have also influenced Pakistan’s regional alignments. Ties with Saudi Arabia and other Muslim-majority states have often overshadowed the need for diverse global partnerships. This narrow approach has limited Pakistan’s room to maneuver in international affairs, particularly when conflicts emerge between its allies.

However, a shift is both possible and necessary. Experts argue that Pakistan must now prioritize a foreign policy rooted in pragmatism, economic growth, and geopolitical balance. In a multipolar world, flexibility and interest-based diplomacy are key to national progress.

Improving relations with India should be a priority under this new framework. Trade, cross-border cooperation, and regional development are being sacrificed due to unresolved emotional grievances. While the Kashmir issue remains significant, it should no longer dictate the entirety of bilateral relations.

Likewise, Pakistan must expand its global diplomatic footprint. Diversifying alliances beyond the U.S., China, and the Gulf can help Pakistan hedge against shifting global dynamics. Engaging with emerging economies, Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia can unlock new economic and strategic opportunities.

CSS Solved Past Papers from 2010 to Date by Miss Iqra Ali

Explore CSS solved past papers (2010 to Date) by Miss Iqra Ali, featuring detailed answers, examiner-focused content, and updated solutions. Perfect for aspirants preparing for CSS with accuracy and confidence.

Explore Now

Finally, neutrality in regional conflicts is vital. Pakistan’s involvement in the Saudi-Iran rivalry and Afghan politics has often complicated its security and diplomatic stability. A neutral, development-focused posture can ensure long-term national interest is preserved above ideological entanglements.

Pakistan stands at a critical juncture in its foreign policy journey. Leaving behind emotional impulses and adopting a rational, interest-centric approach can transform Pakistan’s role in global affairs. Only by aligning diplomacy with economic and strategic realities can Pakistan ensure a peaceful, prosperous, and respected future.

CSS Solved Past Papers from 2010 to Date by Miss Iqra Ali

Explore CSS solved past papers (2010 to Date) by Miss Iqra Ali, featuring detailed answers, examiner-focused content, and updated solutions. Perfect for aspirants preparing for CSS with accuracy and confidence.

Explore Now
Sources
Article History
History
28 July 2025

Written By

Miss Iqra Ali

MPhil Political Science

Author | Coach

Edited & Proofread by

Miss Iqra Ali

GSA & Pakistan Affairs Coach

Reviewed by

Miss Iqra Ali

GSA & Pakistan Affairs Coach

Following are sources to article, “Rethinking Pakistan's Foreign Policy: Ideology vs. National Interest”

History
Content Updated On

Was this Article helpful?

(300 found it helpful)

Share This Article

Comments