Question Breakdown
This question consists of two parts. First, it demands the juristic definitions of Ijtihad and Ijma, two essential concepts in Islamic jurisprudence. This entails explaining their literal meanings, technical applications, and sources in Islamic law. Second, it requires a comprehensive elaboration on how these tools can assist in the Islamization of a modern state, that is, adapting Islamic principles to contemporary governance, social reform, and lawmaking processes. The answer must incorporate classical Islamic understanding along with its relevance and practical usage in modern Islamic societies.
Outline
- Introduction
- Juristic Definition of Ijtihad
- Types and Conditions of Ijtihad
- Juristic Definition of Ijma
- Types of Ijma and its Legal Authority
- The Role of Ijtihad in the Islamization of a Modern State
- Addressing Contemporary Legal Issues
- Guiding Policy Formation
- Technological and Ethical Challenges
- The Role of Ijma in the Islamization of a Modern State
- Ensuring Unity in Lawmaking
- Strengthening Scholarly Legitimacy
- Bridging Traditional and Contemporary Thought
- Complementarity of Ijtihad and Ijma in State Affairs
- Conclusion
Follow Cssprepforum WhatsApp Channel: Pakistan’s Largest CSS, PMS Prep Community updated
Led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, Cssprepforum helps 70,000+ aspirants monthly with top-tier CSS/PMS content. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for solved past papers, expert articles, and free study resources shared by qualifiers and high scorers.
Answer to the Question
Introduction
Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) has evolved as a living legal tradition through the application of tools like Ijtihad and Ijma. While the Qur’an and Sunnah are the primary sources of law, the dynamic nature of human societies has necessitated mechanisms to address new issues and unprecedented circumstances. Ijtihad, or independent reasoning, and Ijma, the consensus of qualified scholars, have historically served as the means to preserve both the flexibility and authenticity of Islamic law. In today’s complex socio-political landscape, these tools offer a pathway for aligning modern statecraft with Islamic ethics, making them vital in the process of Islamization.
Juristic Definition of Ijtihad
The term Ijtihad is derived from the Arabic root "jahada", which means to strive or exert effort. In juristic terms, Ijtihad refers to “the exertion of a qualified jurist's intellectual efforts to derive a legal ruling from the foundational sources of Islam in cases where no explicit ruling exists.” According to Imam Al-Ghazali, Ijtihad is “the total expenditure of effort made by a jurist in order to obtain the knowledge of the Shariah rulings.”
It is a legal process by which scholars interpret the Qur’an and Sunnah to apply Islamic teachings to new issues.
The Prophet (PBUH) endorsed Ijtihad when he said to Muadh ibn Jabal upon appointing him to Yemen, “According to what will you judge?” Muadh replied, “According to the Book of Allah.” The Prophet asked, “If you do not find it there?” Muadh replied, “Then according to the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah.” He asked again, “If you do not find it there?” Muadh replied, “Then I will exert myself (aj-tahidu) to form my own judgment.” The Prophet (PBUH) approved by saying, “Praise be to Allah who has guided the messenger of the Messenger of Allah to what pleases Him.” (Musnad Ahmad)
Types and Conditions of Ijtihad
Ijtihad is of two major types:
- Absolute Ijtihad (Ijtihad al-Mutlaq): Practiced by scholars who are fully qualified to derive rulings from all sources independently.
- Restricted Ijtihad (Ijtihad fi’l-Madhhab): Practiced within the framework of a specific school of thought (e.g., Hanafi, Shafi’i).
Conditions for performing Ijtihad include:
- Mastery of the Arabic language
- Deep knowledge of Qur’an and Sunnah
- Awareness of the objectives of Shariah (Maqasid al-Shariah)
- Familiarity with the opinions of classical jurists
- Integrity and piety
Juristic Definition of Ijma
The word Ijma means “consensus” or “agreement.” Technically, it refers to “The unanimous agreement of the qualified Mujtahideen of the Ummah in any age on a particular legal ruling.”
Imam Al-Amidi defines Ijma as “an agreement of the jurists of a particular era on a legal matter derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah.” The Hadith supports its validity: “My Ummah will never agree upon an error.” (Sunan Ibn Majah)
This principle preserves unity in law and ensures that any ruling agreed upon by the Ummah's scholars is protected from error.
3.5-Month Extensive Compulsory Subjects Course for CSS Aspirants
Struggling with CSS Compulsory subjects? Crack Pakistan Affairs, Islamiat, GSA & Current Affairs in just 3.5 months with Howfiv’s expert-led course. New batches every April, August & December! Secure your spot now – WhatsApp 0300-6322446!
Types of Ijma and Its Legal Authority
Ijma is generally categorized into:
- Explicit Ijma (Ijma Sarih): Clear and unanimous agreement expressed by all jurists.
- Silent Ijma (Ijma Sukooti): When some jurists express a ruling and others remain silent, not objecting.
In Islamic law, Ijma is considered binding and is the third source of legislation after the Qur’an and Sunnah.
The Role of Ijtihad in the Islamization of a Modern State
- Addressing Contemporary Legal Issues
In modern governance, new issues like biotechnology, digital transactions, environmental ethics, and space exploration arise, areas not explicitly addressed in classical texts. Ijtihad allows scholars to apply Islamic principles to such fields using analogy (qiyas) and public welfare (maslahah).
- Guiding Policy Formation
Policies related to taxation, banking, governance, education, and healthcare must be shaped in line with Islamic values. Through Ijtihad, lawmakers can craft Shariah-compliant policies that reflect the needs of a modern population without compromising Islamic teachings.
- Technological and Ethical Challenges
From artificial intelligence to organ transplants and gender issues, the modern age demands dynamic legal thinking. Ijtihad provides a pathway to address these while preserving the moral fabric of society.
The Role of Ijma in the Islamization of a Modern State
- Ensuring Unity in Lawmaking
Ijma helps prevent division among scholars and factions by fostering consensus. In a diverse society, especially in parliamentary systems, achieving consensus among religious scholars supports cohesive and unified legislation.
- Strengthening Scholarly Legitimacy
Ijma reinforces the legitimacy of state policies when a body of credible scholars backs them. This helps bridge the gap between religious authority and political leadership.
- Bridging Traditional and Contemporary Thought
Ijma ensures that the spirit of Islam remains intact while adapting to new realities. It can help unify modern interpretations of Islam while remaining rooted in classical understanding.
Complementarity of Ijtihad and Ijma in State Affairs
While Ijtihad allows flexibility and creativity, Ijma provides stability and certainty. Together, they form a balanced mechanism for modern Islamic governance:
- Ijtihad helps introduce necessary reforms and updates.
- Ijma ensures those reforms are accepted across the board.
This combination ensures that the Islamization of the state remains progressive yet faithful to core Islamic tenets.
Conclusion
Ijtihad and Ijma represent the intellectual strength and unity of Islamic legal tradition. They allow the law to grow with the times while safeguarding its authenticity. In a modern state striving for Islamization, these tools are not relics of the past but essential instruments for practical governance, ethical policymaking, and social justice. By nurturing qualified scholars and establishing platforms for juristic consensus, Muslim states can craft solutions that resonate with both divine guidance and contemporary realities.
