In the intricate fabric of Pakistan's modern political history, the Islamization drive remains a force that has redefined not only state policy but also the ideological contours of the nation. Unlike the democratic experiments or the military interventions that punctuated the country's trajectory, the institutionalization of religion in governance and law left permanent imprints on the collective psyche and institutional architecture. While the fusion of religion and state was not an invention of General Zia-ul-Haq's regime, it was certainly his era that transformed religious sentiment into state doctrine.
Follow CPF WhatsApp Channel for Daily Exam Updates
Led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, Cssprepforum helps 70,000+ aspirants monthly with top-tier CSS/PMS content. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for solved past papers, expert articles, and free study resources shared by qualifiers and high scorers.
Pakistan, at its inception, carried with it an unresolved question regarding its ideological future. Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s emphasis on secular governance and minority rights contrasted sharply with the pressures exerted by religious factions seeking an Islamic state. The Objectives Resolution of 1949, while attempting a balancing act, tilted the debate in favor of a religious framework, creating a foundation for future Islamization. Over time, successive leaders used religious language to consolidate their legitimacy, but none institutionalized it as forcefully as Zia.
Zia’s military rule, which began after the ousting of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in 1977, coincided with both domestic political instability and geopolitical opportunities. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 turned Pakistan into a frontline state, bringing in American and Saudi funding. During this period, Zia-ul-Haq enforced Sharia-based laws, established the Federal Shariat Court, and mandated Zakat and Ushr ordinances, thereby embedding religious jurisprudence into the formal legal system. His Islamization campaign reached into every corner of public life, from media censorship and education reforms to gender regulations and public punishments.
This religious reorientation was not limited to legal amendments. It seeped into the national education curriculum, redefining the Muslim citizen's identity. School textbooks began portraying Hindus and Western powers as historic enemies of Islam, fostering a monolithic narrative. The consequences of these changes were far-reaching, giving rise to a generation shaped by exclusionary ideology. Textbook boards, under state direction, introduced content that glorified jihad and framed Islamic supremacy as a national objective.
The judicial system also underwent a radical transformation. The introduction of Hudood Ordinances and Qisas and Diyat laws created legal ambiguities and encouraged religious interpretation in criminal justice. The burden these laws placed on women, especially in cases related to adultery and rape, exposed the flaws of mixing sacred law with human rights. Women who failed to prove rape under the Hudood Ordinance risked being charged with adultery, a travesty of justice that drew severe criticism from human rights organizations.
Furthermore, the rise of sectarianism cannot be divorced from the state’s patronage of certain religious schools and clerical authorities during and after Zia’s rule. The 1980s witnessed the mushrooming of madrassas, many funded externally, which became ideological training grounds. While initially perceived as tools against communism, they eventually incubated sectarian intolerance. The Shia-Sunni divide grew more violent, especially with Iran and Saudi Arabia vying for influence in Pakistan through local proxies.
Economically, Islamization brought inconsistencies. While interest-free banking was promoted, the economic system remained largely conventional, creating contradictions in fiscal policy. Investors and banks operated under hybrid systems, confusing implementation and regulation. Though slogans of Islamic welfare were raised, poverty and inequality persisted. The state's emphasis on symbolism over substantive reform meant that social justice remained elusive.
Zia's Islamization also marked a decisive shift in civil-military relations. The army was portrayed as not just a defender of the state but also of the faith. Military officers were encouraged to display overt religiosity, and Friday prayers were made compulsory. The ideological framing of national defense began incorporating religious rhetoric, a development that continues to shape strategic thinking.
The post-Zia period did not witness a rollback of these policies. Civilian governments either lacked the will or the political capital to challenge entrenched religious structures. In many cases, they relied on religious parties for coalition building, further legitimizing their presence. The rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan and the global jihadist narrative found echoes in Pakistan's own ideological climate.
Even today, the legacy of Islamization influences both domestic and foreign policy. From blasphemy laws that are frequently misused to suppress dissent, to the selective definition of national identity, the effects are visible. The assassination of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer in 2011 for opposing the blasphemy law showed how deeply entrenched and emotionally charged religious legal structures had become.
Although religious sentiment is a vital part of many Pakistanis' identity, its institutionalization within the state apparatus has compromised legal equity, social cohesion, and policy flexibility. The inability to create a boundary between personal belief and public law has left the country vulnerable to extremism, populist religiosity, and international isolation.
CSS Solved Past Papers from 2010 to Date by Miss Iqra Ali
Explore CSS solved past papers (2010 to Date) by Miss Iqra Ali, featuring detailed answers, examiner-focused content, and updated solutions. Perfect for aspirants preparing for CSS with accuracy and confidence.
What Pakistan needs is a return to the constitutional ethos envisioned by its founding leaders, where religion is respected but not wielded as a political weapon. Deconstructing the legacy of Islamization does not mean undermining faith. Rather, it entails protecting both religion and the republic from exploitation. Reforms must begin in education, law, and political discourse, promoting pluralism, rationalism, and civic responsibility.
Only through such introspection can Pakistan hope to reconcile its Islamic character with its democratic aspirations, ensuring that religion serves as a moral compass rather than a coercive instrument. The task is not merely political, it is civilizational, requiring courage, clarity, and commitment from all sectors of society.
