The age-old question, "Is political science truly a science?", continues to provoke debate among scholars, students, and thinkers alike. While political science aspires to the rigor of scientific methodology, its subject matter, including human, societies, and power structures often defies the predictability of natural sciences. This editorial explores the scientific claims of political science, contextualizes its emergence as a discipline, and evaluates its methodologies, limitations, and contributions. It argues that while political science may not fit the rigid mould of the physical sciences, it qualifies as a science in the broader, social sense: systematic, analytical, and essential to understanding the political world.
Follow Cssprepforum WhatsApp Channel: Pakistan’s Largest CSS, PMS Prep Community updated
Led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, Cssprepforum helps 70,000+ aspirants monthly with top-tier CSS/PMS content. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for solved past papers, expert articles, and free study resources shared by qualifiers and high scorers.
Political science, as an organized field of study, has evolved significantly from its classical roots. The discipline's lineage can be traced back to ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, who examined the state, governance, and justice through normative and philosophical lenses. For centuries, political thought was intertwined with moral philosophy and legal theory, lacking the empirical foundation that modern sciences are known for.
In the 20th century, particularly after World War II, political science experienced a methodological revolution. The behaviouralist movement sought to bring the discipline closer to the empirical standards of the natural sciences. Inspired by developments in sociology and psychology, behavioralism emphasized observation, data collection, hypothesis testing, and the search for patterns in political behaviour. This marked a shift from philosophical speculation to a more systematic and evidence-based approach.
Today, political science encompasses diverse subfields, like comparative politics, international relations, public policy, political theory, and political economy, each utilizing distinct methodologies but united in the quest to understand how power is acquired, exercised, and contested. The question, then, is whether these approaches allow political science to qualify as a true science, or whether its inherent subjectivity and complexity make it fundamentally different from the natural sciences.
The Scientific Foundations of Political Inquiry
Modern political science utilizes a range of tools akin to those used in the natural and social sciences. Researchers begin with hypotheses, collect data through surveys, interviews, or archival research, and employ statistical tools to test theories. For instance, political scientists might examine voter turnout by correlating variables, like age, income, education, and ethnicity. Through such models, the discipline seeks to discover underlying patterns and establish generalizable theories.
Moreover, formal modelling, borrowing from economics and mathematics, enables political scientists to build predictive frameworks. Game theory, for instance, helps explain strategic behaviour in diplomacy, elections, and legislative bargaining. The use of these quantitative tools and structured methodologies showcases the discipline’s commitment to scientific rigor, even if the predictions are probabilistic rather than absolute.
Theory-Building and the Pursuit of General Laws
A defining feature of scientific disciplines is their capacity to generate theories that explain phenomena across time and space. Political science contributes by producing both mid-range and grand theories. Realism and liberalism in international relations, structural functionalism in comparative politics, and institutionalism in public policy are just a few theoretical frameworks that guide research.
These theories help explain political stability, regime change, voting behavior, and policy outcomes. For example, the “democratic peace theory” posits that democracies are less likely to go to war with each other, a hypothesis that has undergone extensive empirical testing. Similarly, the median voter theorem provides insight into electoral strategies and party behaviour in democracies. Although these theories often allow exceptions, they provide valuable lenses for analysis, much like theories in the physical sciences that work within certain boundaries.
Comparative Methodology and Global Relevance
Political science’s reliance on comparative methodology enhances its scientific legitimacy. By systematically comparing political systems, institutions, and behaviors across countries, scholars identify patterns and causations. For instance, studies on democratization compare transitions in Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Africa to understand what factors, for example, economic development, civil society strength, and foreign influence contribute to stable democracy.
This global, comparative approach allows political science to move beyond mere description to explanation and, to some extent, prediction. For instance, analyses of electoral systems show consistent relationships between proportional representation and multiparty systems. This pattern, observed in different countries, supports the idea that political outcomes can be understood through systematic study, hallmarks of scientific inquiry.
Normative Dimensions: A Necessary Complexity
One of the primary critiques against political science being a “true” science lies in its normative concerns. Unlike physics or chemistry, political science deals with values, such as justice, liberty, equality, rights, which are inherently subjective. However, this normative aspect does not negate its scientific dimensions; rather, it complements them by addressing the ‘why’ and ‘ought’ questions of political life.
Just as ethics plays a role in medicine or environmental science, normative analysis is vital in political science. For example, debates over the legitimacy of authoritarianism versus democracy are not purely empirical; they involve philosophical reflection. Political theory, a vital branch of political science, dives into these questions, not as abstract musings but as frameworks for evaluating governance and public morality.
Furthermore, the presence of value-laden questions in political science does not preclude the use of scientific tools. Scholars can assess, for instance, whether a certain policy improves social welfare, reduces inequality, or increases civic participation, using measurable indicators and comparative analysis. Thus, normative engagement enhances the relevance and richness of the discipline.
The Discipline's Impact on Policy and Governance
Political science’s real-world impact further supports its claim to scientific status. Political scientists regularly advise governments, international organizations, and NGOs on issues ranging from conflict resolution to electoral design. Public policy analysis, a subfield that blends political theory with economics, law, and administration, relies on cost-benefit analysis, data modelling, and outcome evaluation, all of which reflect scientific practices.
Political risk analysis, election forecasting, governance indexes, and policy evaluations increasingly use big data, machine learning, and algorithmic tools. Institutions, like the World Bank, the UN, and national governments, depend on political science research to formulate evidence-based policies. This real-world applicability underlines the systematic and empirical foundations of the discipline.
Want to Prepare for CSS/PMS English Essay & Precis Papers?
Learn to write persuasive and argumentative essays and master precis writing with Sir Syed Kazim Ali to qualify for CSS and PMS exams with high scores. Limited seats available; join now to enhance your writing and secure your success.
Despite its methodological rigor, political science cannot replicate the controlled conditions of a lab. Human behaviour is fluid, influenced by emotions, identities, and historical contingencies. The same political system can yield different outcomes depending on context. This limits the generalizability and predictive capacity of political theories. However, such complexity does not disqualify it as a science. Rather, it situates political science within the broader domain of social sciences: empirical, systematic, and reflective, but attuned to human variability.
In the final analysis, political science qualifies as a science, not in the rigid, deterministic sense of physics or chemistry, but as a social science committed to empirical analysis, structured reasoning, and theoretical development. It systematically studies power, governance, and political behaviour through observation, comparison, and evidence-based inquiry. While it must grapple with values and human unpredictability, these challenges only enhance its relevance. Thus, political science stands as a hybrid discipline, part science, part philosophy, indispensable for making sense of the political complexities that define our world.
