Give a detailed chronological historical perspective of the Kashmir conflict.

             Outline 

1. Introduction

2. Pre-1947: Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir 

• 2.1 Formation of the Princely State (1846)
• 2.2 Characteristics of Dogra Rule and Growing Discontent
• 2.3 Emergence of Political Awakening
• 2.4 The Eve of Partition (1947) 

3. 1947-1948: Partition of British India, Accession of Kahmir, and the First Indo-Pak War 

• 3.1 Partition of British India (August 1947)
• 3.2 Accession of Jammu and Kashmir (October 1947)
• 3.3 The First Indo-Pak War (1947-1948) 

4.1949-1987: Post-War Developments and Rising Dissatisfaction 

• 4.1 Integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India
• 4.2 United Nations and Internationalization of Dispute
• 4.3 Indo-Pakistani Wars and Their Impact on Kashmir
• 4.4 Rising Dissatisfaction and Political Instability (1970s-1980s) 

5. 1987-Present: Insurgency, Cross-Border Terrorism, and Recent Developments 

• 5.1 The Onset of Insurgency (Late 1980s - 1990s)
• 5.2 Kargil War (1999)
• 5.3 Post-Kargil & Attempts at Dialogue (2000s - Early 2010s)
• 5.4 Recent Developments and Abrogation of Article 370 (2019 - Present) 

6. Conclusion 

1. Introduction 

The conflict over Jammu and Kashmir represents one of the most intractable and enduring territorial disputes in modern history. More than seven decades after the Partition of British India, this complex struggle, rooted in colonial legacy, princely intrigue, ideological partition, and great power competition, continues to define relations between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan and profoundly impacts the political and human landscape of the disputed region. This detailed historical analysis traces the conflict's origins under the Dogra dynasty, examines the pivotal events of the 1947 Instrument of Accession and the subsequent wars, details the rise of a deep-seated armed insurgency fueled by political manipulation, and culminates in the watershed moment of the 2019 revocation of Kashmir's special constitutional status. By following a strict chronological and thematic outline, this article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the layered historical, political, legal, and strategic developments that have shaped the dispute into its current, volatile form.

Follow CPF WhatsApp Channel for Daily Exam Updates

Cssprepforum, led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, supports 70,000+ monthly aspirants with premium CSS/PMS prep. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for daily CSS/PMS updates, solved past papers, expert articles, and free prep resources.

Follow Channel

Advertise with Us

2. Pre-1947: Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir 

The period before 1947 is crucial for understanding the Kashmir conflict, as it lays the groundwork for the dispute that erupted upon the partition of British India. During this time, Jammu and Kashmir existed as a large princely state under British paramountcy, but with significant internal autonomy. 

2.1 Formation of the Princely State (1846) 

• Treaty of Amritsar (1846): The modern princely state of Jammu and Kashmir was formally created after the First Anglo-Sikh War. Following the defeat of the Sikh Empire, the British East India Company annexed the Kashmir Valley as war indemnity. However, instead of administering it directly, they sold it to Maharaja Gulab Singh, a Dogra chieftain who was already the Raja of Jammu. Gulab Singh paid 7.5 million Nanak Shahi rupees for the territory. This treaty marked the beginning of Dogra rule over the diverse regions of Jammu, Kashmir Valley, Ladakh, and Gilgit-Baltistan.
• Dogra Dynasty: Gulab Singh became the founder of the Dogra dynasty, which ruled Jammu and Kashmir for over a century, until 1947. Subsequent rulers included Ranbir Singh and Hari Singh. 

2.2 Characteristics of Dogra Rule and Growing Discontent 

• Predominantly Muslim Population, Hindu Rulers: A significant demographic reality of the princely state was that the majority of the population, especially in the Kashmir Valley, was Muslim, while the ruling Dogra dynasty was Hindu. This religious disparity between the rulers and the ruled often fueled grievances.
• Oppression and Discrimination: Dogra rule is often characterized by significant economic exploitation, heavy taxation, forced labor (begar), and discrimination against the Muslim majority. For instance, shawl weavers faced high taxes and miserable wages. This created deep-seated resentment among the Kashmiri populace.
• Feudal System: The state operated under a largely feudal system, where land ownership and administrative positions were heavily skewed in favor of the Hindu elite and Dogra nobility, further marginalizing the Muslim peasantry. 

2.3 Emergence of Political Awakening 

• Early 20th Century: The early 20th century saw the gradual emergence of political consciousness and organized resistance against the Maharaja's rule. Educated Muslims, inspired by broader nationalist movements in British India, began to articulate their grievances and demand reforms. 

• 1931 Kashmir Agitation (Martyrs' Day): This year marked a pivotal turning point. 

  Background: Incidents of alleged desecration of the Quran and the arrest of a Punjabi Muslim named Abdul Qadeer for an incendiary speech against the Maharaja fueled widespread anger among Muslims. 

  July 13, 1931: Thousands gathered outside Srinagar Central Jail for Qadeer's trial. When a Kashmiri stood up to deliver the adhan (call to prayer), Dogra forces opened fire, killing 22 people. This event, known as the "Martyrs' Day," became a powerful symbol of resistance and ignited a sustained struggle for justice and self-determination. 

  Aftermath: The massacre spurred political mobilization. The Maharaja was forced to appoint the Glancy Commission to investigate the grievances, which led to some political reforms, including the introduction of a legislative assembly (Jammu and Kashmir Praja Sabha). Crucially, the events of 1931 brought Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah to prominence as a key leader of the Kashmiri people. 

• Formation of Political Parties 

  All Jammu & Kashmir Muslim Conference (1932): In October 1932, in the wake of the 1931 agitation, Sheikh Abdullah, along with other prominent leaders like Chaudhry Ghulam Abbas, founded the All Jammu & Kashmir Muslim Conference. This party aimed to represent the political interests of the Muslim community in J&K and advocate for their rights. 

  Transformation to National Conference (1939): Over time, Sheikh Abdullah, influenced by secular and nationalist ideals and his association with leaders of the Indian freedom movement like Jawaharlal Nehru, recognized the need for a broader, inclusive platform. In 1939, the Muslim Conference was renamed the Jammu Kashmir National Conference (JKNC). This transformation was meant to include all communities (Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists) in the struggle against the autocratic Dogra rule and advocate for a secular, democratic, and responsible government. This shift, however, led to a split, with some leaders, including Chaudhry Ghulam Abbas, breaking away to revive the Muslim Conference with closer ties to the All-India Muslim League. 

  "Quit Kashmir" Movement (1946): In the lead-up to India's independence, the JKNC, under Sheikh Abdullah, launched the "Quit Kashmir" movement. This agitation demanded that the Maharaja "quit Kashmir" and hand over power to the people, aligning with the broader anti-colonial sentiment sweeping British India. 

2.4 The Eve of Partition (1947) 

• Princely States' Dilemma: As British India prepared for partition, the 562 princely states, which were not directly part of British India but under its paramountcy, were given the choice to accede to either India or Pakistan or remain independent.
• Maharaja Hari Singh's Indecision: Maharaja Hari Singh, the then-ruler of J&K, initially harbored ambitions of keeping Kashmir independent. He signed "Standstill Agreements" with both India and Pakistan, seeking to maintain existing administrative arrangements. However, the deeply divided nature of his state, with a Muslim majority but a Hindu ruler, made his decision particularly complex and fraught with peril.
• Growing Pressure: The state faced internal unrest, particularly in its western districts (Poonch and Mirpur), where a rebellion against Dogra rule was brewing. Simultaneously, Pakistan began exerting pressure for Kashmir's accession, viewing it as a natural fit due to its Muslim majority and geographical contiguity. 

This pre-1947 period thus set the stage for the post-partition conflict, highlighting the historical grievances, political aspirations, and the complex demographic and political landscape that would explode into full-blown conflict in late 1947. 

3. 1947-1948: Partition of British India, Accession of Kashmir, and the First Indo-Pak War  

The period of 1947-1948 marks the genesis of the Kashmir conflict as an international dispute, directly following the momentous Partition of British India. 

3.1 Partition of British India (August 1947) 

• End of British Rule: After nearly two centuries of British colonial rule, India gained independence on August 15, 1947. Simultaneously, the new Muslim-majority nation of Pakistan was carved out, largely based on the "Two-Nation Theory," which posited that Hindus and Muslims constituted two separate nations.
• Princely States' Choice: A key aspect of the partition plan, as laid out in the Indian Independence Act of 1947, was the future of the more than 560 princely states. These states, which had enjoyed varying degrees of autonomy under British paramountcy, were given the option to accede to either India or Pakistan or to remain independent. This provision was crucial for Kashmir, given its unique demographic and political situation.
• Mass Migration and Violence: The partition triggered one of the largest and most violent mass migrations in human history. Millions of Muslims migrated to Pakistan, and millions of Hindus and Sikhs migrated to India, often amidst widespread communal violence, leading to immense suffering and loss of life. 

3.2 Accession of Jammu and Kashmir (October 1947) 

• Maharaja Hari Singh's Dilemma: Jammu and Kashmir, with its predominantly Muslim population but ruled by the Hindu Maharaja Hari Singh, initially hoped to remain independent. He signed "Standstill Agreements" with both India and Pakistan, intending to maintain existing administrative and economic ties.
• Invasion by Tribal Militias: However, this precarious independence was short-lived. In late October 1947, Pashtun tribal militias, supported by Pakistan, launched an invasion of Jammu and Kashmir. Their objective was to seize the state and force its accession to Pakistan. The tribal forces advanced rapidly, engaging in looting, violence, and destruction, reaching dangerously close to the capital, Srinagar.
• Maharaja's Plea for Aid: Facing an imminent collapse of his state, Maharaja Hari Singh desperately appealed to India for military assistance.
• The Instrument of Accession (October 26, 1947): India, led by Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, made it clear that military intervention could only occur if Jammu and Kashmir formally acceded to India. Under immense pressure, Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession on October 26, 1947, ceding control over defense, external affairs, and communications to the Dominion of India.
• India's Acceptance with a Rider: Lord Mountbatten, the Governor-General of India, accepted the Instrument of Accession on October 27, 1947. However, he added a crucial rider: "it is my Government's wish that as soon as law and order have been restored in Jammu and Kashmir and her soil cleared of the invader, the question of the State's accession should be settled by a reference to the people." This commitment to a plebiscite (referendum) became a central point of contention in the years to come.
• Indian Military Intervention: Immediately after the signing of the Instrument of Accession, India airlifted troops to Srinagar. These forces played a critical role in repelling the tribal invasion and saving Srinagar from falling. 

3.3 The First Indo-Pak War (1947-1948) 

• Escalation of Conflict: The Indian intervention led to a full-scale war between India and Pakistan. While India maintained its forces were in Kashmir to defend the legally acceded territory, Pakistan argued that the accession was fraudulent and coerced, and that its support for the tribal forces was a response to the oppression of Muslims in Kashmir. Regular Pakistani army units eventually became directly involved in the fighting.
• Battlefronts: The war was fought across various fronts, including the Kashmir Valley, Poonch, and Gilgit-Baltistan. Indian forces pushed back the invaders from significant parts of the Valley, while Pakistani forces, along with tribal militias, gained control of areas that would become "Azad Kashmir" and Gilgit-Baltistan.
• UN Intervention and Ceasefire: On January 1, 1948, India took the Kashmir dispute to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). The UNSC adopted Resolution 39 (1948), establishing the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) to investigate and mediate the dispute. On January 1, 1949, a UN-mediated ceasefire was implemented.
• Line of Control (LoC): The ceasefire line, established by the Karachi Agreement in July 1949, essentially divided the former princely state into two parts: Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir, and Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan. This line, later renamed the Line of Control (LoC) in the 1972 Simla Agreement, became the de facto border that persists to this day.
• UN Resolutions and Plebiscite: The UN resolutions, notably UNSC Resolution 47 (1948), called for a plebiscite to determine the final status of Jammu and Kashmir. However, the conditions for holding the plebiscite, particularly the withdrawal of Pakistani forces and the substantial reduction of Indian forces, were never fully met by both sides, leading to an impasse. 

This period of 1947-1948 fundamentally shaped the Kashmir dispute, establishing the territorial division, the competing claims of India and Pakistan, and the framework for international involvement through the United Nations.

3.5-Month Extensive Compulsory Subjects Course for CSS Aspirants

Struggling with CSS Compulsory subjects? Crack Pakistan Affairs, Islamiat, GSA & Current Affairs in just 3.5 months with Howfiv’s expert-led course. New batches every April, August & December! Secure your spot now – WhatsApp 0300-6322446!

Join Now

Advertise with Us

4.1949-1987: Post-War Developments and Rising Dissatisfaction  

The period between 1949 and 1987 in Kashmir was characterized by India's gradual integration of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Union, ongoing diplomatic and military confrontations with Pakistan, and a simmering, eventually escalating, sense of dissatisfaction within Indian-administered Kashmir. This era laid the groundwork for the armed insurgency that would erupt in 1989. 

4.1 Integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India (1949-1960s) 

Following the 1948 ceasefire, India began to consolidate its control over the part of Jammu and Kashmir it administered. 

• Special Status (Article 370): In 1949, Article 370 was incorporated into the Indian Constitution, granting Jammu and Kashmir a special autonomous status. This article limited the Indian Parliament's power to make laws for J&K to only defense, foreign affairs, and communications, unless the state government concurred. It was intended to be a temporary provision, but its abrogation became a highly contentious issue much later.
• Constituent Assembly and Elections: In 1951, elections were held for a Constituent Assembly in Jammu and Kashmir. The Jammu & Kashmir National Conference (JKNC), led by Sheikh Abdullah, won all 75 seats. This assembly was tasked with drafting the state's constitution and ratifying the Instrument of Accession.
• "Hollowing Out" of Article 370: Over the subsequent decades, through various Presidential Orders and with the concurrence of the J&K legislative assembly (which critics argue became increasingly pliable to New Delhi's influence), many provisions of the Indian Constitution were extended to J&K. This process, often referred to as the "hollowing out" of Article 370, gradually eroded the state's autonomy beyond the initial terms of accession. For example, Article 35A, empowered by a 1954 Presidential Order, defined the rights of permanent residents, prohibiting non-residents from owning property or securing government jobs in the state.
• Sheikh Abdullah's Dismissal and Imprisonment (1953): Sheikh Abdullah, initially a strong proponent of Kashmir's accession to India, began advocating for greater autonomy and even independence, causing friction with New Delhi. On August 8, 1953, he was controversially dismissed as Prime Minister by the then Sadr-i-Riyasat (Head of State) Dr. Karan Singh (son of Maharaja Hari Singh) on charges of having lost the confidence of his cabinet. He was subsequently arrested and imprisoned for over a decade (with a brief release in 1964), accused of conspiracy against the state (the "Kashmir Conspiracy Case," which was later withdrawn). This event profoundly alienated a significant section of the Kashmiri populace and fueled anti-India sentiment. Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad replaced him, and his government oversaw further integration measures. 

4.2 United Nations and Internationalization of the Dispute 

• UNMOGIP: The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) was established in 1949 to monitor the ceasefire line, and it remains present in the region.
• Unfulfilled Plebiscite: Despite several UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite to determine the final status of Kashmir, the conditions for its implementation (particularly the demilitarization agreed upon by both sides) were never met. India maintained that the accession was final and valid, and with J&K's elected Constituent Assembly having ratified the accession, a plebiscite was no longer necessary. Pakistan continued to demand a plebiscite, citing the UN resolutions. The UN's efforts at mediation ultimately failed due to irreconcilable differences in the positions of India and Pakistan regarding demilitarization. 

4.3 Indo-Pakistani Wars and Their Impact on Kashmir 

• 1965 Indo-Pakistani War: This was the second major conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. Pakistan, believing India was vulnerable after the 1962 Sino-Indian War and misjudging the level of Kashmiri support for an uprising, launched "Operation Gibraltar" by sending armed infiltrators into Indian-administered Kashmir to incite a rebellion. This was followed by a full-scale military offensive ("Operation Grand Slam"). India retaliated by opening up other fronts across the international border, aiming to relieve pressure on Kashmir. The war ended in a stalemate with a UN-brokered ceasefire. 

  Tashkent Declaration (1966): Following the war, India and Pakistan signed the Tashkent Declaration, mediated by the Soviet Union. Both countries agreed to withdraw their forces to pre-August 5, 1965, positions. The war did not alter the Line of Control, but it reinforced Pakistan's belief that military means could be used to challenge the status quo in Kashmir. 

• 1971 Indo-Pakistani War: While primarily focused on the Bangladesh Liberation War (resulting in the creation of Bangladesh from East Pakistan), this war also saw fighting along the LoC in Kashmir. India gained significant military advantage, particularly after Pakistan's defeat in the East. 

  Simla Agreement (1972): Following the 1971 war, India and Pakistan signed the Simla Agreement. This was a crucial bilateral treaty that: 

1. Officially designated the 1949 ceasefire line as the Line of Control (LoC) and committed both sides to respect it without prejudice to their recognized positions.
2. Stated that both countries would settle their differences "by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations," implicitly reducing the scope for third-party mediation (like the UN) on the Kashmir issue.
3. Emphasized resolving "basic issues and causes of conflict" to establish durable peace. While India viewed the Simla Agreement as converting the LoC into a de facto international border and making Kashmir a purely bilateral issue, Pakistan maintained that it did not preclude a final settlement based on UN resolutions. 

4.4 Rising Dissatisfaction and Political Instability (1970s-1980s) 

Despite the Simla Agreement, underlying grievances in Indian-administered Kashmir continued to fester and grow, leading to widespread dissatisfaction. 

• Indira-Sheikh Accord (1975): After years of imprisonment and political maneuvering, Sheikh Abdullah returned to power as Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir in 1975, following an accord with Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. While he largely accepted the integration measures undertaken since 1953, the accord was seen by many Kashmiris as a compromise of their demand for greater autonomy, further eroding his once unquestioned authority among some sections. 

• Political Manipulation and Perceived Betrayal: The period was marked by accusations of central government interference in J&K's internal affairs, including perceived manipulation of elections. 

  1987 Assembly Elections: These elections are widely considered a major catalyst for the armed insurgency. The Muslim United Front (MUF), a coalition of various opposition parties, was seen by many as a genuine alternative to the ruling National Conference (which often allied with the Indian National Congress). However, the elections were widely believed to be rigged in favor of the National Conference-Congress alliance. This perceived electoral fraud deeply disillusioned a generation of Kashmiri youth who had placed their hopes in democratic processes. Many young people, including future militants, felt that peaceful political avenues were closed off to them. 

• Economic Stagnation and Unemployment: Despite some development, the region faced significant economic challenges, including high unemployment, especially among educated youth. This economic discontent fueled the sense of alienation.
• Growing Influence of Islamist Ideologies: The late 1970s and 1980s also saw a gradual rise in Islamist ideologies, partly influenced by the Iranian Revolution (1979) and the Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989), which provided a narrative of successful armed resistance against a superpower. Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) also began to actively support and exploit this growing discontent, gradually shifting from a focus on political movements to backing armed groups.
• Demographic Shifts and Hindu Exodus (Early Signs): While the major exodus of Kashmiri Pandits occurred in the early 1990s, the seeds of communal tensions and fear were being sown in the 1980s, with targeted killings and the increasing radicalization of some elements. 

By the late 1980s, the cumulative effect of political disenfranchisement, economic grievances, the failure of democratic avenues, and external influences created a fertile ground for the eruption of a full-blown armed insurgency. 

5. 1987-Present: Insurgency, Cross-Border Terrorism, and Recent Developments  

The period from 1987 to the present marks a dramatic and often violent phase in the Kashmir conflict, characterized by the rise of armed insurgency, significant cross-border terrorism, and a series of political and military developments that have reshaped the landscape of the dispute. 

5.1 The Onset of Insurgency (Late 1980s - 1990s) 

The insurgency began as an indigenous political reaction to the 1987 election fraud but was swiftly internationalized and militarized by external forces. 

• 1987 Election Rigging 

Widely cited as the immediate catalyst for the insurgency, the 1987 Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly elections were perceived by many Kashmiris as heavily rigged. The Muslim United Front (MUF), a coalition of opposition parties, believed to have widespread support, allegedly had its victory stolen. This deeply disillusioned a generation of Kashmiri youth who lost faith in democratic processes. Many who had campaigned for MUF, including future militant commanders, subsequently crossed over to Pakistan for arms training. 

• Rise of Militant Groups: Fueled by political alienation, economic grievances, and the perceived closure of peaceful avenues, armed groups began to emerge. 

  Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF): Initially advocating for an independent Kashmir, the JKLF gained significant traction in the early years of the insurgency, with its slogan of "Azadi" (freedom). 

  Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM): As the insurgency progressed, other groups, often with a more Islamist and pro-Pakistan orientation, gained prominence. These groups, primarily based in Pakistan, were allegedly supported, trained, and funded by the Pakistani state, particularly its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). 

• Cross-Border Infiltration and Arms Flow: The withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989 led to a significant influx of weapons and battle-hardened militants into Kashmir, facilitated by Pakistan. This escalated the conflict from localized protests to a full-blown armed rebellion.
• Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits (1990): In early 1990, amidst a climate of rising militancy, targeted killings, and fear, a significant portion of the Hindu Kashmiri Pandit minority was forced to flee the Kashmir Valley. This remains a deeply traumatic event for the Pandit community and a contentious issue in the conflict's narrative.
• Human Rights Concerns: The 1990s were marked by widespread human rights abuses on both sides. Indian security forces were accused of extrajudicial killings, torture, enforced disappearances, and arbitrary detentions during counter-insurgency operations. Militant groups were responsible for targeted killings of civilians (including political opponents, informers, and minority community members), kidnappings, and bombings. The Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), granting broad powers to security forces, became a major point of contention.  

5.2 Kargil War (1999) 

• Pakistani Infiltration: In early 1999, Pakistani soldiers and militants infiltrated Indian-administered Kashmir, occupying strategic heights in the Kargil district along the Line of Control.
• Indian Counter-Offensive (Operation Vijay): India launched a massive military and diplomatic counter-offensive to evict the intruders. The conflict, fought at high altitudes and in harsh conditions, saw intense battles.
• International Pressure: With India threatening to escalate the conflict, the United States, under President Bill Clinton, put immense pressure on Pakistan to withdraw its forces.
• Impact: The Kargil War ended with the withdrawal of Pakistani forces. It significantly damaged bilateral relations, exposed the dangers of nuclear-armed neighbors engaging in direct conflict, and highlighted Pakistan's continued efforts to alter the status quo in Kashmir through unconventional warfare. 

5.3 Post-Kargil & Attempts at Dialogue (2000s - Early 2010s) 

• Escalation of Terrorist Attacks: The early 2000s witnessed major terrorist attacks, including: 

  2001 Attack on J&K Assembly: Militants attacked the state legislative assembly in Srinagar. 

  2001 Indian Parliament Attack: A daring attack on the Indian Parliament in New Delhi was widely attributed to Pakistan-based groups, bringing India and Pakistan to the brink of war. 

• Peace Initiatives and CBMs: Despite the heightened tensions, there were efforts to de-escalate and engage in dialogue: 

  Ceasefire (2003): India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire along the Line of Control in November 2003, which has largely held, though violations continue. 

  Bus Services and Cross-LoC Trade: The "Karavan-e-Aman" (Caravan of Peace) bus service connecting Srinagar and Muzaffarabad (in Pakistan-administered Kashmir) began in 2005, followed by cross-LoC trade in 2008. These measures aimed to facilitate people-to-people contact and economic activity across the divided region. 

  Composite Dialogue: Both countries engaged in a "Composite Dialogue" process covering various issues, including Kashmir, but concrete breakthroughs on the core dispute remained elusive. 

• Declining but Persistent Militancy: While large-scale coordinated attacks became less frequent, localized encounters, infiltration attempts, and the rise of suicide attacks (fidayeen attacks) continued.
• Unrest in the Valley (2008, 2010, 2016): Indian-administered Kashmir continued to experience periods of intense public unrest, often triggered by specific incidents of alleged human rights abuses or perceived injustices. These protests often involved stone-pelting by youth, met with pellet guns and tear gas by security forces, leading to casualties. 

5.4 Recent Developments and Abrogation of Article 370 (2019 - Present) 

• Pulwama Attack (February 2019): A suicide bombing in Pulwama, Indian-administered Kashmir, claimed by the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed, killed over 40 Indian paramilitary personnel. This was one of the deadliest attacks on Indian security forces in decades.
• Balakot Airstrike (February 2019): India retaliated with an airstrike on an alleged Jaish-e-Mohammed training camp in Balakot, Pakistan, leading to aerial skirmishes between the two air forces. 

• Revocation of Article 370 and Article 35A (August 5, 2019): In a landmark and controversial move, the Indian government unilaterally revoked Article 370 and Article 35A of the Indian Constitution, effectively ending Jammu and Kashmir's special autonomous status. 

  Integration: This move fully integrated Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Union, making all provisions of the Indian Constitution applicable to the region. 

  Bifurcation: The state of Jammu and Kashmir was bifurcated into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir (with a legislature) and Ladakh (without a legislature, directly administered by the central government). 

  Aftermath: The decision was accompanied by an unprecedented security lockdown, communication blackout (internet and mobile services suspended), and the detention of political leaders. India argued that this was necessary to curb terrorism, promote development, and fully integrate the region. Pakistan condemned the move as illegal and a violation of international law. The international community's response was largely muted, with some expressing concern over human rights but largely acknowledging it as an internal matter for India. 

• Post-2019 Security Situation: While major organized militant attacks have reduced, there has been a shift in militant tactics towards more targeted killings (including of minorities and migrant workers) and increased use of sticky bombs and drones. India has maintained a heavy security presence and conducted extensive counter-terrorism operations.
• Political Landscape: Mainstream political parties in Jammu and Kashmir have struggled to regain their footing after the abrogation. The region remains under central control, with assembly elections yet to be held (as of mid-2025).
• International Dimension: The Kashmir issue continues to be a point of tension between India and Pakistan, though international focus has shifted to concerns over human rights and regional stability rather than the question of accession or plebiscite. China also voiced concerns over the changes, particularly regarding Ladakh, given its own territorial disputes with India. 

The period from 1987 to the present represents a brutal and transformative chapter in the Kashmir conflict, cementing its position as one of the world's most enduring and complex geopolitical flashpoints. The revocation of Article 370 has ushered in a new phase, with its long-term consequences still unfolding.

CSS Solved Current Affairs Past Papers

Unlock the power of insight with CSS Solved Current Affairs (2010 – To Date) by Sir Ammar Hashmi; your ultimate guide to mastering CSS with precision, clarity, and confidence!

Explore Now!

Advertise with Us

6. Conclusion  

The chronological history of the Kashmir conflict is one of recurring cycles of internal resistance, international warfare, diplomatic failure, and geopolitical intervention. The dispute transitioned from a colonial land sale to a post-partition accession crisis, was solidified by the Line of Control, and has been continuously stoked by political disillusionment and cross-border insurgency. The most recent constitutional changes of 2019 have fundamentally altered the legal and political landscape of the region under Indian administration, effectively closing the chapter on the conditional accession framework of 1947. 

Today, the Kashmir conflict remains a complex entanglement of competing national sovereignty claims, international legal questions (particularly concerning the unfulfilled plebiscite), the ever-present threat of nuclear escalation, and the long-suppressed political aspirations of the Kashmiri people themselves. With the LoC firmly in place and the constitutional status unilaterally resolved by India, the future trajectory of the dispute will likely hinge on resolving the internal political vacuum and navigating the highly fraught bilateral relationship between India and Pakistan in a manner that ensures stability and respects the fundamental human rights of the region's inhabitants. The complexity and enduring nature of the conflict ensure its continued place as one of the world's most watched and most dangerous unresolved disputes.