Democracy, by its nature, demands continuity, maturity, and a commitment to institutional rule. In Pakistan, these principles have often been subordinated to factional rivalry, elite dominance, and extra-constitutional interventions. Political instability in the country has become a recurring crisis, not merely a symptom of a fragile democracy, but a structural ailment deeply embedded in its political culture and institutional design.
Follow CPF WhatsApp Channel for Daily Exam Updates
Led by Sir Syed Kazim Ali, Cssprepforum helps 70,000+ aspirants monthly with top-tier CSS/PMS content. Follow our WhatsApp Channel for solved past papers, expert articles, and free study resources shared by qualifiers and high scorers.
The seeds of instability were sown in the early years of independence when Pakistan failed to adopt a constitution for nearly nine years. Frequent changes in leadership and the dissolution of constituent assemblies signaled an absence of consensus on the direction of the new state. Civil and military bureaucracy took advantage of the political vacuum, gradually undermining democratic institutions. Between 1947 and 1958, Pakistan saw seven prime ministers replaced through palace intrigues and bureaucratic maneuvering rather than popular will. This early erosion of democratic legitimacy opened the door for military intervention in 1958, setting a pattern that would repeat itself across decades.
Military rule, though often justified in the name of stability and reform, has left behind deeper scars of political distortion. General Ayub Khan's regime introduced a controlled form of democracy that centralized power, weakened political parties, and promoted a technocratic elite over mass political participation. Subsequent martial laws under General Ziaul Haq and General Pervez Musharraf further entrenched a culture where political authority derived not from the electorate but from institutional manipulation and patronage networks. The legacy of these interventions has been a political culture where legitimacy is routinely undermined by backdoor arrangements, judicial validations, and extra-parliamentary pressures.
In this environment, political parties have failed to mature into democratic institutions. Most operate as dynastic enterprises where leadership is inherited, dissent is suppressed, and party structures are reduced to electoral machines serving the interests of a few. Internal democracy remains absent, as seen in the lack of regular party elections or mechanisms of accountability within party ranks. According to the 2023 PILDAT report, none of the major political parties in Pakistan met even the basic standards of intra-party democracy, with party constitutions frequently violated and leadership contests avoided.
These internal weaknesses in parties have had external consequences. When parties come to power, their leadership often centralizes authority in the prime ministerial office, bypassing parliament and cabinet systems. The result is a highly personalized mode of governance vulnerable to abrupt disruption when leadership falters or faces opposition. Moreover, political polarization has intensified over the years, turning opposition into enmity and democratic competition into zero-sum conflict. Coalition governments, instead of promoting pluralism, often descend into unstable alliances where horse-trading and floor-crossing replace principled policy-making.
Institutional checks and balances, essential for democratic health, have failed to function effectively. Parliament has rarely operated as a forum for substantive legislation or debate. Judiciary, rather than serving as a neutral arbiter, has been repeatedly drawn into political controversies, often legitimizing undemocratic interventions. The civil bureaucracy, once envisioned as the backbone of governance, has been politicized and rendered ineffective by frequent transfers, lack of meritocracy, and allegiance to ruling cliques. Election commissions, though constitutionally empowered, struggle to ensure transparency due to partisan pressures and administrative weaknesses.
Ethnic and provincial tensions have further complicated the national political landscape. Instead of accommodating diversity, successive governments have resorted to centralized control, alienating peripheral regions. Balochistan, Sindh, and parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa continue to voice grievances about exclusion, resource distribution, and political marginalization. These grievances, left unaddressed, become fertile ground for secessionist narratives and anti-state sentiment, further destabilizing national cohesion.
Adding to this complexity is the growing role of informal power networks. From religious pressure groups to media conglomerates and business lobbies, multiple unelected actors now influence political outcomes without accountability. The proliferation of hybrid governance arrangements, where elected and unelected institutions share power informally, has blurred lines of responsibility and weakened public trust. A 2021 Carnegie Endowment study highlighted that patronage politics, fueled by institutional weakness, is a dominant mode of political survival in Pakistan, with elected officials often more beholden to elite networks than to their constituents.
Economic instability exacerbates political turmoil. Frequent changes in policy direction, lack of continuity in economic reform, and politically motivated fiscal decisions create an unpredictable business environment. Foreign donors and financial institutions lose confidence in long-term partnerships. Inflation, unemployment, and weak public services erode the social contract, pushing citizens towards political apathy or extremist alternatives. Political instability, therefore, does not exist in isolation but reinforces a cycle of economic fragility, governance breakdown, and societal unrest.
To imagine a stable democratic future for Pakistan, a fundamental shift is required. This includes strengthening political parties through enforced internal democracy, transparent financing, and merit-based leadership development. The judiciary must reclaim its independence by resisting political manipulation and focusing on constitutional integrity. Civil bureaucracy needs protection from politicization and incentives for professionalism. Parliament should emerge as a center of policy debate rather than rubber-stamping executive decisions.
Furthermore, institutional reform must be accompanied by a change in political culture. Tolerance for dissent, recognition of legitimate opposition, and respect for constitutional norms are essential for democratic continuity. Media and civil society should act as watchdogs rather than partisan actors. Military institutions must return fully to their constitutional role and avoid engagement in political engineering. Decentralization should be pursued in letter and spirit, ensuring provinces have control over their resources and policymaking.
CSS Solved Past Papers from 2010 to Date by Miss Iqra Ali
Explore CSS solved past papers (2010 to Date) by Miss Iqra Ali, featuring detailed answers, examiner-focused content, and updated solutions. Perfect for aspirants preparing for CSS with accuracy and confidence.
In the final analysis, Pakistan’s instability is neither accidental nor spontaneous. It is the result of systemic erosion of democratic values, institutions, and practices. Political elites have often chosen expediency over principle, personal gain over public service, and confrontation over consensus. Without a clear reconfiguration of civil-military relations, repeated disruptions in democratic governance will continue to derail institutional growth and national unity. Unless these patterns are reversed through bold reform, institutional strengthening, and cultural transformation, Pakistan’s democratic project will remain incomplete and vulnerable.
The time for superficial adjustments has passed. What is required is structural change led by a political leadership willing to rise above factional interests and put the country’s democratic survival above personal ambition. Only then can the republic hope to achieve the stability, integrity, and resilience that democracy demands and the people deserve.
